The Injustice of Property
download cover image ►

The Injustice of Property

Homeless Encampments and the Limits of Liberalism

Title Details

Pages: 184

Illustrations: 8 b&w images

Trim size: 6.000in x 9.000in

Formats

Paperback

Pub Date: 07/01/2025

ISBN: 9-780-8203-7364-5

List Price: $29.95

EPUB

Pub Date: 06/01/2025

ISBN: 9-780-8203-7365-2

List Price: $29.95

Hardcover

Pub Date: 07/01/2025

ISBN: 9-780-8203-6640-1

List Price: $119.95

The Injustice of Property

Homeless Encampments and the Limits of Liberalism

How the injustices surrounding Portland’s encampment communities reflect the limits of liberal property more broadly

Skip to

  • Description

With the rise of homelessness in many U.S. cities, municipal governments are sanctioning organized encampments as an official strategy for sheltering unhoused people. Examining the shortcomings and consequences of these municipal policies, The Injustice of Property explores how unhoused individuals living in self-managed encampments navigate and organize themselves within and against the confines of liberal property systems. Through ethnographic research in Portland, Oregon, a paradigmatic city in advancing this model of homeless shelter, Stephen Przybylinski details the everyday struggles of self-managed encampments to highlight how key contradictions inherent to liberal ideology maintain property as a means of structuring sociopolitical equality. He argues that justice cannot be realized for unhoused communities within the liberal model of private property due to how liberalism and liberal ideology prioritize the rights and values of property over the personal rights of self-governance.

The Injustice of Property is a conceptually robust and empirically rich account of the limits of liberal thinking regarding what “just” property relations look like for unhoused and housed people alike. The book shows that while encampment communities struggle to establish alternative property relationships to the traditional model of private ownership, the injustices that residents of encampments face provoke a necessary reevaluation of how beneficiaries of property systems influence who can become housing stable and on which terms. This insightful book reveals how the injustices surrounding Portland’s encampment communities reflect the limits and injustice of liberal property more broadly.